- eventfd.cpp and eventfd.s will output to the same file when building libc.a
out/target/product/*/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc_intermediates/WHOLE/libc_common_objs/eventfd.o
- And then `eventfd` will undefined when statically linked to libc.
Also add a unit test.
(cherry-pick of 8baa929d5d3bcf63381cf78ba76168c80c303f5e.)
Change-Id: Icd0eb0f4ce0511fb9ec00a504d491afd47d744d3
We use the system call constants from the kernel header files now,
so there's no need to check that they've been correctly transcribed
into SYSCALLS.TXT.
This is a work in progress. I've added TODOs to SYSCALLS.TXT explaining
what's left to do.
(cherry-pick of a51916b58b2d211bcf8ffdbe9cf7faa58e57382f.)
Change-Id: I4484acd946b1f548ac3d95327e58add9f98246ab
- eventfd.cpp and eventfd.s will output to the same file when building libc.a
out/target/product/*/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc_intermediates/WHOLE/libc_common_objs/eventfd.o
- And then `eventfd` will undefined when statically linked to libc.
Also add a unit test.
Change-Id: Ib310ade3256712ca617a90539e8eb07459c98505
We use the system call constants from the kernel header files now,
so there's no need to check that they've been correctly transcribed
into SYSCALLS.TXT.
This is a work in progress. I've added TODOs to SYSCALLS.TXT explaining
what's left to do.
Change-Id: I3b86acfe7f84b4da1c802ee5a4ef13a2e83e7939
Currently, our getaddrinfo implementation does not conform to
any IETF standard. It follows draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-01,
but that draft has expired. Update the policy table to RFC6724.
(cherry-pick of e919b116d35aa7deb24ddece69c491e24c3b0d6f.)
Bug: 8276725
Change-Id: I2d17122defd966ac6c2c13d04887fb110f2598a0
Currently, our getaddrinfo implementation does not conform to
any IETF standard. It follows draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-01,
but that draft has expired. Update the policy table to RFC6724.
Bug: 8276725
Change-Id: I03c63abfcad9b2f3a3bab2718bd2fc6440531843
This uses the new code original submitted as memcpy.a15.S as
the base. However, the old code handled unaligned src/dst better
so that was spliced in. I optimized the original unaligned code by
removing a few unnecessary instructions. I optimized the a15 code by
rewriting the pre and post code. I also modified the main loop to add
a pld so that larger copies would not stall waiting for memory.
Test cases for the new memcpy:
- Copy all sized values from 0 to 1024 bytes, using whatever alignment
is returned by malloc.
For each alignment case described below, the test copied from 0 to 128
bytes.
- Src and dst pointers are both aligned to the same value, starting
at one going through every power of two up to and including 128.
- Src aligned to double word boundary, dst aligned to word boundary.
- Src aligned to word boundary, dst aligned to double word boundary.
- Src aligned to 16 bit boundary, dst aligned to word boundary.
- Src aligned to word boundary, dst aligned to 16 byte boundary.
- Src aligned to word boundary, dst aligned to 1 byte from a word
boundary.
- Src aligned to word boundary, dst aligned to 2 bytes from a word
boundary.
- Src aligned to word boundary, dst aligned to 3 bytes from a word
boundary.
- Src aligned to 1 byte from a word boundary, dst aligned to a word
boundary.
- Src aligned to 2 bytes from a word boundary, dst aligned to a word
boundary.
- Src aligned to 3 bytes from a word boundary, dst aligned to a word
boundary.
Cases to verify the unaligned source code properly aligns to a 16 bit
boundary.
- Src aligned to 1 byte from a 128 bit boundary, dst aligned to
4 + 128 bit boundary.
- Src aligned to 1 byte from a 128 bit boundary, dst aligned to
8 + 128 bit boundary.
- Src aligned to 1 byte from a 128 bit boundary, dst aligned to
12 + 128 bit boundary.
- Src aligned to 1 byte from a 128 bit boundary, dst aligned to
16 + 128 bit boundary.
In all cases, a two byte fencepost was placed at the end of the
destination to verify that only the requested number of bytes were copied.
Bug: 8005082
Change-Id: I700b2fab81941959d301ab1934c18fbd8ee3eee4
pthread_create returns EAGAIN when it can't allocate a pthread_internal_t,
when it can't allocate a stack for the new thread, or when clone(2) fails
because there are too many threads. It's useful to be able to know why your
pthread_create just failed, so add some logging.
Bug: 8470684
(cherry picked from commit cfa089df23)
Change-Id: Ibfc98a84c1817a931f9ae4c2b88762f0edfb6b79
