- Clean up the labels (add .L to make them local).
- Change to using cfi directives.
- Fix unwinding of the __memcpy_chk fail path.
Bug: 18033671
Change-Id: I12845f10c7ce5e6699c15c558bda64c83f6a392a
Any pre-C++11 clients of stdatomic.h that use libc++ are being forced
over to <atomic>, which they don't have the language support to use.
Change-Id: I62445c1f2541410a1569498c09433c7196635537
All we're actually interested in is the unwinder. Since that's now a
separate library, just use that.
Change-Id: If86071a0d850da961336a58147b70369ace7bd12
Add the missing prototypes, fix the existing prototypes to use clockid_t
rather than int, fix clock_nanosleep's failure behavior, and add simple
tests.
Bug: 17644443
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=77372
Change-Id: I03fba369939403918abcabae9551a7123953d780
Signed-off-by: Haruki Hasegawa <h6a.h4i.0@gmail.com>
The mallinfo usmblks value returned by dlmalloc is a little misleading.
It's not the current max, it's the historical high water mark. This
leads to dumpsys meminfo producing native memory numbers that don't add up.
Change this to the real total footprint, not this high water mark.
Bug: 17265653
(cherry pick from commit f4ada9c9ce)
Change-Id: I2fba10285859dccfe8331063c9be14cc169f2d91
valgrind seems to mess with the stack enough that the kernel will
report "[stack:pid]" rather than "[stack]" in /proc/self/maps, so
switch to the task-specific file instead to force "[stack]". (There
are two conditions in the kernel code that decides which form to
output.)
Bug: 17897476
Change-Id: Iff85ceb6d52e8716251fab4e45d95a27184c5529
It turns out that appportable has a version that calls dlmalloc directly.
Re-add the dlmalloc symbol for 32 bit only as a compatibility shim that
calls malloc.
Bug: 17881362
(cherry pick commit from c9734d24d9)
Change-Id: Iee9a777f66a1edb407d7563a60792b767ac4f83a
This change should probably be made upstream as well, but they have a
note about not using it because it isn't available on all systems.
Change-Id: I6d8404c031bd2f486532ced55d94bbb4a4cd2e71
__open_2() is used by the fortify implementation of open(2) in
fcntl.h, and as such needs an unmangled C name. For some reason
(inlining?), this doesn't cause problems at the default optimization
level, but does for -O0.
The rest of these didn't cause build failures, but they look suspect
and probably will, we just haven't caught them yet.
Bug: 17784968
Change-Id: I7391a7a8999ee204eaf6abd14a3d5373ea419d5b
This library calls pthread_mutex_lock and pthread_mutex_unlock with a NULL
pthread_mutex_t*. This gives them (and their users) one release to fix things.
Bug: 17443936
Change-Id: I3b63c9a3dd63db0833f21073e323b3236a13b47a
At -O0, the attribute warning on sprintf is actually triggered (why
doesn't this happen with -Os?!) and promoted to an error by -Werror.
asctime64_r() is a non-standard function, but the IBM docs state that
the buffer is assumed to be at least 26 characters wide, and the
format string does limit to that (assuming a 4 digit year, also
defined by the IBM docs).
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.bpxbd00/asctimer.htm
Change-Id: I1c884474a769aa16c53e985c3d8d694c478c1189
For silvermont, the __popcountsi2 symbol does not get exported by libc.
But for atom, this symbol is exported. Since we already exported this symbol
for previous releases, it's better to just follow through and force
the export, but only for 32 bit. x86 64 bit will not export this symbol.
Bug: 17681440
(cherry picked from commit d11eac3455)
Change-Id: I93704c721d98d569922f606f214069bda24872ba
For silvermont, the __popcountsi2 symbol does not get exported by libc.
But for atom, this symbol is exported. Since we already exported this symbol
for previous releases, it's better to just follow through and force
the export, but only for 32 bit. x86 64 bit will not export this symbol.
Bug: 17681440
Change-Id: I6c62245f0960910f64baaaf6d9d090bf3ea5f435
Otherwise the gcc compiler warning doesn't show up.
Add -Wno-error to fortify related tests. Fortify related tests
are expected to be examples of bad programs, and in many
cases shouldn't compile cleanly. Rewriting them to compile
cleanly isn't feasible nor desirable.
Bug: 17784968
Change-Id: I93bececa7444d965f18c7c27d46e7abce5c49a02
