The kernel system call faccessat() does not have any flags arguments,
so passing flags to the kernel is currently ignored.
Fix the kernel system call so that no flags argument is passed in.
Ensure that we don't support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. This non-POSIX
(http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/access.html)
flag is a glibc extension, and has non-intuitive, error prone behavior.
For example, consider the following code:
symlink("foo.is.dangling", "foo");
if (faccessat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", R_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) == 0) {
int fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", O_RDONLY | O_NOFOLLOW);
}
The faccessat() call in glibc will return true, but an attempt to
open the dangling symlink will end up failing. GLIBC documents this
as returning the access mode of the symlink itself, which will
always return true for any symlink on Linux.
Some further discussions of this are at:
* http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2014-September/003617.html
* http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6952
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW seems broken by design. I suspect this is why this
function was never added to POSIX. (note that "access" is pretty much
broken by design too, since it introduces a race condition between
check and action). We shouldn't support this until it's clearly
documented by POSIX or we can have it produce intuitive results.
Don't support AT_EACCESS for now. Implementing it is complicated, and
pretty much useless on Android, since we don't have setuid binaries.
See http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=0a05eace163cee9b08571d2ff9d90f5e82d9c228
for how an implementation might look.
Bug: 18867827
Change-Id: I25b86c5020f3152ffa3ac3047f6c4152908d0e04
Build was broken by:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/133834
Use <unistd.h> to get syscall().
Remove <asm/unistd.h>, it gets included through <sys/syscall.h>.
Change-Id: Id762f6dea5f9538c19b79cdd46deda978efd50fe
The * flag to printf() wants an int instead of size_t, and these are
distinct types on 64-bit. To accomodate this, make the name column
width helpers return int.
In theory this truncates things, but in practice this only matters if
you have a benchmark with more than INT_MAX characters in its name (in
which case you have bigger problems).
Change-Id: I3338948c25a3a8d84f1ead2f5b457c05da8a01cf
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Changes:
- Modify the benchmarks to derive from a single Benchmark object.
- Rewrite the main iteration code. This includes changing the iteration
code to use the actual total time calculated by the benchmark as a basis
for determining whether there are enough iterations instead of using
the time it takes to run the benchmark.
- Allow benchmarks to take no argument, int, or double.
- Fix the PrettyInt printer for negative integers.
- Modify the max column width name to include the whole name including
the arg part.
- Reformat property_benchmark.cpp in line with the rest of the code.
- Modify a few of the math benchmarks to take an argument instead of
separate benchmarks for the same function with different args.
- Create a vector of regex_t structs to represent the args all at
once instead of when running each benchmark.
This change is in preparation for adding new math based benchmarks.
Tested by running on a nexus flo running at max using the new code
and the old code and comparing. All of the numbers are similar, but
some of the iterations are different due to the slightly different
algorithm used.
Change-Id: I57ad1f3ff083282b9ffeb72e687cab369ce3523a
We still have issues with clang coverage in static libraries, so we
need to make sure we follow suit with the rest of libc for now.
Bug: 17574078
Change-Id: I2ab58a84b1caa0d8d08415d240c35adec5b1e150
I still don't think we can make stdio's fseeko and ftello work, but we can
have everything else, and very few programs use fseeko/ftello (and they can
just refrain from using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and be no worse off than they are
today).
Bug: 11865851
Change-Id: Ic3cb409aae6713f4b345de954bcc4241fcd969ec
The replacement new failures present in newer versions are present
here as well, with the following new issues:
XPASS std/localization/locale.categories/category.numeric/locale.nm.put/facet.num.put.members/put_long_double.pass.cpp
This is from the -NaN formatting fix in bionic. We previously had this
wrong, and the upstream test is also wrong. There's currently an XFAIL
for Android in this test because I haven't fixed the upstream test
yet. After that is done, I'll need to teach the test runner how to
XFAIL older Android versions...
FAIL std/localization/locale.categories/category.ctype/facet.ctype.special/facet.ctype.char.dtor/dtor.pass.cpp
dtor.pass.cpp:39: int main(): assertion "globalMemCounter.checkDeleteArrayCalledEq(1)" failed
Haven't investigated this one yet. http://b/19412688
Note that this also needs the libgcc link ordering to be fixed in the
build system, as we'll otherwise depend on libgcc symbols from libc
that may or may not have been there.
The build fix can't be submitted because the proper link order causes
the libgcc unwinder to be used instead of the EHABI one:
http://b/18471342
Bug: 18471532
Change-Id: Icf560485a9b8f5ebbe01e4458703e62ec94df5e1
Now passes all libc++ tests for these targets, with the exception of
the usual failing replacement new tests since libc uses new/delete for
things. I don't know if we can ever really fix these.
Bug: 18471532
Change-Id: Ibc0a15f26b0e4613249b5e15ecf3cf80e523467c
