Glibc calls theirs __ctype_get_mb_cur_max. Make ours match to cut down
on differences between bionic and glibc.
Bug: 11156955
Change-Id: Ib7231f01aa9676dff30aea0af25d597bfe07bc73
Glibc calls theirs __ctype_get_mb_cur_max. Make ours match to cut down
on differences between bionic and glibc.
Bug: 11156955
Change-Id: Ib7231f01aa9676dff30aea0af25d597bfe07bc73
Also scan NDK's unwanted symbols list (to show the things that we're
exporting but the NDK isn't. Symbols hidden in the NDK will be marked
with a *.
Add a -u (--unwanted) flag to disable the first two printed groups
(all symbols in bionic, all symbols in glibc). This is helpful when
wanting to grep in the list of unwanted symbols.
Finally, update the list of known differences between us and glibc.
Change-Id: I6fdb4126823098430454763c391bd8cd369a75bb
Has the effect of making ___mtctxres hidden.
Bug: 11156955
Change-Id: I5aa5f49344ad5ecb33f48737430561b329bcbb0d
(cherry picked from commit 891ec7a6e46e60d7dfa1cf229e14a8e8634e272b)
Do not run symbol lookup on already visited soinfos
Not taking into account already visited libraries
dramatically slows down dlsym in cases when there
are multiple occurrences of a large library in
dependency tree.
Bug: 16977077
(cherry picked from commit 042426ba6375f5c145379e598486ec6d675533c9)
Change-Id: I69d59e395e8112f119343e8a4d72fe31cd449f31
Do not run symbol lookup on already visited soinfos
Not taking into account already visited libraries
dramatically slows down dlsym in cases when there
are multiple occurrences of a large library in
dependency tree.
Bug: 16977077
Change-Id: I1379f30ed8b06758dd1cc76b80833ac8589afa50
Now that -Bsymbolic is fixed, we can hide __libc_malloc_dispatch without
breaking ASAN.
Bug: 11156955
Change-Id: Ia2fc9b046a74e666b33aa6c6c5435f70a63b8021
Now that -Bsymbolic is fixed, we can hide __libc_malloc_dispatch without
breaking ASAN.
Bug: 11156955
Change-Id: Ia2fc9b046a74e666b33aa6c6c5435f70a63b8021
The old definition only worked for functions that didn't use numbered
local labels. Upstream uses '666' not only as some kind of BSD in-joke,
but also because there's little likelihood of any function having
labels that high.
There's a wider question about whether we actually want to go via the
PLT at all in this code, but that's a question for another day.
Bug: 16906712
Change-Id: I3cd8ecc448b33f942bb6e783931808ef39091489
The old definition only worked for functions that didn't use numbered
local labels. Upstream uses '666' not only as some kind of BSD in-joke,
but also because there's little likelihood of any function having
labels that high.
There's a wider question about whether we actually want to go via the
PLT at all in this code, but that's a question for another day.
(cherry-pick of 72d7e667c7e926cb120c4edb53cbf74c652ab915.)
Bug: 16906712
Change-Id: I3cd8ecc448b33f942bb6e783931808ef39091489
