5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Elliott Hughes
011e111d29 Ensure __set_errno is still visible on LP32.
The use of the .hidden directive to avoid going via the PLT for
__set_errno had the side-effect of actually making __set_errno
hidden (which is odd because assembler directives don't usually
affect symbols defined in a different file --- you can't even
create a weak reference to a symbol that's defined in a different
file).

This change switches the system call stubs over to a new always-hidden
__set_errno_internal and has a visible __set_errno on LP32 just for
binary compatibility with old NDK apps.

(cherry-pick of 7efad83d430f4d824f2aaa75edea5106f6ff8aae.)

Bug: 17423135
Change-Id: I6b6d7a05dda85f923d22e5ffd169a91e23499b7b
2014-09-08 16:46:50 -07:00
Dan Albert
bc9f9f25bf Make __set_errno hidden in asm.
This fixes the build after the -Bsymbolic change.

Bug: 16853291
Change-Id: I989c9fec3c32e0289ea257a3bd2b7fd2709b6ce2
2014-08-08 15:35:47 -07:00
Elliott Hughes
9abbbdc534 Make mips/mips64 syscall stubs more like the other architectures.
Change-Id: I55f8c1a95f643a6e484f12fbcc25e2c77e55b6b8
2014-02-19 14:54:31 -08:00
Elliott Hughes
eae27dc55a Make mips generated assembler more like the mips64 stuff.
I broke the mips build yesterday because it doesn't use
<private/bionic_asm.h> like the other architectures, including mips64.
I want to move mips closer to mips64 to try to avoid this kind of thing
in future.

Change-Id: Idb985587ff355b9e5e765c1f5671dc0144cd2488
2014-02-19 12:20:00 -08:00
Elliott Hughes
0f461e35f6 Fix <sys/resource.h>.
The situation here is a bit confusing. On 64-bit, rlimit and rlimit64 are
the same, and so getrlimit/getrlimit64, setrlimit/setrlimit64,
and prlimit/prlimit64 are all the same. On 32-bit, rlimit and rlimit64 are
different. 32-bit architectures other than MIPS go one step further by having
an even more limited getrlimit system call, so arm and x86 need to use
ugetrlimit instead of getrlimit. Worse, the 32-bit architectures don't have
64-bit getrlimit- and setrlimit-equivalent system calls, and you have to use
prlimit64 instead. There's no 32-bit prlimit system call, so there's no
easy implementation of that --- what should we do if the result of prlimit64
won't fit in a struct rlimit? Since 32-bit survived without prlimit/prlimit64
for this long, I'm not going to bother implementing prlimit for 32-bit.

We need the rlimit64 functions to be able to build strace 4.8 out of the box.

Change-Id: I1903d913b23016a2fc3b9f452885ac730d71e001
2014-01-09 11:00:04 -08:00