clone(2) is the public symbol.
Also switch a test from __bionic_clone to clone; testing public API
means the test now works on glibc too.
Change-Id: If59def26a00c3afadb8a6cf9442094c35a59ffde
Don't support the dynamic linker loading ET_EXEC executables. Only
support ET_DYN executables.
Bug: 14566672
Change-Id: Ia1f2bfffe7ea867c1cd62e67d7fd637c60c0728d
when compile the cts package with aarch64 gcc4.9, will get following error:
bionic/tests/wchar_test.cpp:253:3: required from here
external/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h:1448:16:
error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
this change fix it by using static_cast<wchar_t> as suggested by Calin Juravle
Change-Id: I7fb9506e7b84b8a12b9d003458d4f0e78554c3cd
Signed-off-by: Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org>
This matches what frameworks/base does with Build.VERSION and means that
bionic's version number will always sort >= than any released version.
This should prevent confusion in code that builds both against bionic
and the NDK.
(Note that <sys/cdefs.h> drags this in, so it's always in the namespace.)
Bug: 14613709
Change-Id: I91fb745920e848a6b20f2f5797c0a7d6cde6c032
Configure multilib for bionic-unit-tests-glibc-run target (the path to
the host executable was already patched to support multilib build but
the multilib itself wasn't configured).
Change-Id: If533fbdb19bc737e543cf85a0787505458f24579
This more general interface lets liblog give us any fatal log message,
regardless of source. This means we can remove the special case for
LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL with a simpler scheme that automatically works for
the VM too.
Change-Id: Ia6dbf7c3dbabf223081bd5159294835d954bb067
Reserve 12 more bytes in sem_t to give room for future implementation
improvements. This gets us to a 16 bytes sem_t. Glibc uses 32 bytes (16
actual use + 16 reserved), while OpenBSD has 16 bytes (out of which 4
are for padding).
Bug: 14587103
Bug: 12875898
Change-Id: Id835cc5abf874c651e6b5ad5b8f29c9d6ab08d5a
Increase (UT_NAMESIZE,UT_LINESIZE,UT_HOSTSIZE) to (32,32,256).
Nobody writes utmp on Android but it would be nice to be aligned
with others who use 32,32,256 (like glibc). If ever used it will produce
nicer logging. There is no consensus in BSDs for these values.
Bug: 14584341
Bug: 12875898
Change-Id: I94af10b982b8f9fcaea897c4cf968563f38403f9
Change pthread_rwlockattr_t from int to long. On LP64 this gives us more
room for extensibility since longs are 8 bytes. glibc also reserves 8
bytes for this.
Bug: 14582681
Bug: 12875898
Change-Id: I55d599be0fdbbf0cb55957ec0ea62ab042bdee94
Spawn 20 child processes, have them all load the library, and compare
the total PSS used in the case where we use dlopen() and the case where
we use android_dlopen_ext() with relro sharing. We assume we will save
at least 10% of the memory; in practise this example saves 40% or more
so this should be a reasonable threshold.
Bug: 14299541
Change-Id: Idccf6b8b0eb137abae2200f1ce68fb76b3cbdd75
I've reported the wcsftime bug upstream, but we really just want to use -D
to ensure the buggy code isn't built. (I've also brought our strftime a bit
closer to upstream now we have the right define.)
I don't think upstream is likely to fix all their sign-compare and
uninitialized warnings, so let's just silence them.
As for libm, again upstream isn't likely to fix all their warnings, and
silencing those made the ones that were our fault stand out. I've fixed
our <math.h> to fix the warnings caused by our lack of definitions for
the non-imprecise long-double functions. I checked the C99 standard, and
all these functions are there.
Change-Id: Iee8e1182c1db375058fb2c451eceb212bab47a37
Description: In the kernel the epoll_event structure is packed
in 64 bit kernel builds to allow the structure to be more easily
compatible with 32 bit user space. As a result, when user space
is 64-bit the structure must be packed as well.
Add unit test to show the ptr alignment issue.
Change-Id: I2c4848d5e38a357219091f350f9b6e3da05090da
Signed-off-by: Philip Hatcher <philip.hatcher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hazarika, Prodyut <prodyut.hazarika@intel.com>
Tested-by: Hazarika, Prodyut <prodyut.hazarika@intel.com>
