This upgrade involved rewriting the script; the data has moved to ftp.iana.org,
where it's slightly less convenient to access, so it's time to use something
that can talk FTP...
As for tzdata2012d, it's just updating Morocco for this weekend's changes, now
they've been decided at the last minute (as usual).
Change-Id: I772df57a6e09b3bf3d9541bfc08930d6f18633b4
Given that _elf_lookup (and thus, _do_lookup) cannot possibly return an
undefined symbol (due to the check for SHN_UNDEF in _elf_lookup), there's
no need for spurious checks for SHN_UNDEF on its return value.
Conflicts:
linker/linker.c
Change-Id: Ic73cf439924b45f72d4d9ba3f64a888c96cbbd9b
GDB needs the runtime linker's base address in order to
locate the latter's ".text" and ".plt" sections, for the
purpose of detecting solib trampolines. It also can
potentially use this to calculate the relocated address
of rtld_db_dlactivity.
Bug: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=34856
Change-Id: I63d3e7ae4e20a684ceb25967f2241e7d58dd685d
Signed-off-by: Ryan V. Bissell <ryan@bissell.org>
This test is designed to detect code such as:
int main() {
char buf[10];
memcpy(buf, "1234567890", sizeof(buf));
size_t len = strlen(buf); // segfault here with _FORTIFY_SOURCE
printf("%d\n", len);
return 0;
}
or anytime strlen reads beyond an object boundary. This should
help address memory leakage vulnerabilities and make other
unrelated vulnerabilities harder to exploit.
Change-Id: I354b425be7bef4713c85f6bab0e9738445e00182
In our previous FORTIFY_SOURCE change, we started using a custom
inline for memcpy(), rather than using GCC's __builtin_memcpy_chk().
This allowed us to delete our copy of __memcpy_chk(), and replace it
by __memcpy_chk2().
Apparently GCC uses __memcpy_chk() outside of __builtin_memcpy_chk().
Specifically, __memcpy_chk() is used by __builtin__memMOVE_chk() under
certain optimization levels.
Keep the old __memcpy_chk() function around, and have it call into
__memcpy_chk2().
Change-Id: I2453930b24b8a492a3b6ed860e18d92a6b762b80
Two changes:
1) Detect memory read overruns.
For example:
int main() {
char buf[10];
memcpy(buf, "abcde", sizeof(buf));
sprintf("%s\n", buf);
}
because "abcde" is only 6 bytes, copying 10 bytes from it is a bug.
This particular bug will be detected at compile time. Other similar
bugs may be detected at runtime.
2) Detect overlapping buffers on memcpy()
It is a bug to call memcpy() on buffers which overlap. For
example, the following code is buggy:
char buf3[0x800];
char *first_half = &buf3[0x400];
char *second_half = &buf3[1];
memset(buf3, 0, sizeof(buf3));
memcpy(first_half, second_half, 0x400);
printf("1: %s\n", buf3);
We now detect this at compile and run time.
Change-Id: I092bd89f11f18e08e8a9dda0ca903aaea8e06d91
memmove() unconditionally calls memcpy() if "dst" < "src". For
example, in the code below, memmove() would end up calling memcpy(),
even though the regions of memory overlap.
int main() {
char buf3[0x800];
char *dst = &buf3[1];
char *src = &buf3[0x400];
memset(buf3, 0, sizeof(buf3));
memmove(dst, src, 0x400);
printf("1: %s\n", buf3);
return 0;
}
Calling memcpy() on overlaping regions only works if you assume
that memcpy() copies from start to finish. On some architectures,
it's more efficient to call memcpy() from finish to start.
This is also triggering a failure in some of my code.
More reading:
* http://lwn.net/Articles/414467/
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477#c31 (comment 31)
Change-Id: I65a51ae3a52dd4af335fe5c278056b8c2cbd8948
libc's stack protector initialization routine (__guard_setup)
is in bionic/ssp.c. This code deliberately modifies the stack
canary. This code should never be compiled with -fstack-protector-all
otherwise it will crash (mismatched canary value).
Force bionic/ssp.c to be compiled with -fno-stack-protector
Change-Id: Ib95a5736e4bafe1a460d6b4e522ca660b417d8d6
