Redesign dlopen() locks to be recursive per thread.
That is to fix the bug: dlxxx functions can't be called recursively. For example, if we use dlopen() to use open one library whose constructor also calls dlopen() in order to open another library, then the thread is dead-blocked. By changing the dl_lock from a non-recursive lock to a recursive lock, we can prevent the thread from dead-blocked by recursive dlxxx calls in the same thread context. Change-Id: I1018b41c82f4641cc009c0a2eda31f5a47a534f9 Signed-off-by: Pavel Chupin <pavel.v.chupin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Ren <jack.ren@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bruce Beare <bruce.j.beare@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a60ff6c5b2
commit
e19d702b8e
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static const char *dl_errors[] = {
|
||||
#define likely(expr) __builtin_expect (expr, 1)
|
||||
#define unlikely(expr) __builtin_expect (expr, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
static pthread_mutex_t dl_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
|
||||
pthread_mutex_t dl_lock = PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
|
||||
|
||||
static void set_dlerror(int err)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user