Merge "Don't treat private IPv4 addresses as being in a non-global scope. The effect of this change is essentially to prefer NATed IPv4 over 6to4."
This commit is contained in:
commit
81e03be699
@ -1497,11 +1497,13 @@ _get_scope(const struct sockaddr *addr)
|
|||||||
if (IN_LOOPBACK(na) || /* 127.0.0.0/8 */
|
if (IN_LOOPBACK(na) || /* 127.0.0.0/8 */
|
||||||
(na & 0xffff0000) == 0xa9fe0000) { /* 169.254.0.0/16 */
|
(na & 0xffff0000) == 0xa9fe0000) { /* 169.254.0.0/16 */
|
||||||
return IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL;
|
return IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL;
|
||||||
} else if ((na & 0xff000000) == 0x0a000000 || /* 10.0.0.0/8 */
|
|
||||||
(na & 0xfff00000) == 0xac100000 || /* 172.16.0.0/12 */
|
|
||||||
(na & 0xffff0000) == 0xc0a80000) { /* 192.168.0.0/16 */
|
|
||||||
return IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_SITELOCAL;
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* According to draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-01 section 2.3,
|
||||||
|
* it is best not to treat the private IPv4 ranges
|
||||||
|
* (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16) as being
|
||||||
|
* in a special scope, so we don't.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
return IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_GLOBAL;
|
return IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_GLOBAL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user