Fix lgamma_r/lgammaf_r/lgammal_r for -0.
Upstream has implemented lgammal/lgammal_r for ld128, and fixed the sign problem we reported with all the lgamma*_r functions and -0. Bug: 17471883 Change-Id: Ibb175d9cab67efae75f1010796fd44c9ba6ce4fc
This commit is contained in:
@@ -459,9 +459,12 @@ long double tanhl(long double);
|
||||
long double tanl(long double);
|
||||
long double tgammal(long double);
|
||||
long double truncl(long double);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* __ISO_C_VISIBLE >= 1999 */
|
||||
|
||||
#if __BSD_VISIBLE
|
||||
long double lgammal_r(long double, int *);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__USE_GNU)
|
||||
void sincos(double, double*, double*);
|
||||
void sincosf(float, float*, float*);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user