* commit 'd2b129881acb7000f7943bfdb47782f505026cc0': Migrate pthread_rwlock implementation away from sys/atomics
This commit is contained in:
commit
66aba0d8b2
@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <errno.h>
|
||||
#include <sys/atomics.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "pthread_internal.h"
|
||||
#include "private/bionic_futex.h"
|
||||
@ -53,7 +52,7 @@
|
||||
* write" cases and will deadlock in write after read case.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* TODO: VERY CAREFULLY convert this to use C++11 atomics when possible. All volatile
|
||||
* members of pthread_rwlock_t should be converted to atomics<> and __atomic_cmpxchg
|
||||
* members of pthread_rwlock_t should be converted to atomics<> and __sync_bool_compare_and_swap
|
||||
* should be changed to compare_exchange_strong accompanied by the proper ordering
|
||||
* constraints (comments have been added with the intending ordering across the code).
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -147,17 +146,17 @@ static int __pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock, const timespec
|
||||
int32_t cur_state = rwlock->state; // C++11 relaxed atomic read
|
||||
if (__predict_true(cur_state >= 0)) {
|
||||
// Add as an extra reader.
|
||||
done = __atomic_cmpxchg(cur_state, cur_state + 1, &rwlock->state) == 0; // C++11 memory_order_aquire
|
||||
done = __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&rwlock->state, cur_state, cur_state + 1); // C++11 memory_order_aquire
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!timespec_from_absolute(rel_timeout, abs_timeout)) {
|
||||
return ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Owner holds it in write mode, hang up.
|
||||
// To avoid losing wake ups the pending_readers update and the state read should be
|
||||
// sequentially consistent. (currently enforced by __atomic_inc which creates a full barrier)
|
||||
__atomic_inc(&rwlock->pending_readers); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed (if the futex_wait ensures the ordering)
|
||||
// sequentially consistent. (currently enforced by __sync_fetch_and_add which creates a full barrier)
|
||||
__sync_fetch_and_add(&rwlock->pending_readers, 1); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed (if the futex_wait ensures the ordering)
|
||||
int ret = __futex_wait_ex(&rwlock->state, rwlock_is_shared(rwlock), cur_state, rel_timeout);
|
||||
__atomic_dec(&rwlock->pending_readers); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed
|
||||
__sync_fetch_and_sub(&rwlock->pending_readers, 1); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed
|
||||
if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
|
||||
return ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -180,17 +179,17 @@ static int __pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock, const timespec
|
||||
int32_t cur_state = rwlock->state;
|
||||
if (__predict_true(cur_state == 0)) {
|
||||
// Change state from 0 to -1.
|
||||
done = __atomic_cmpxchg(0 /* cur_state */, -1 /* new state */, &rwlock->state) == 0; // C++11 memory_order_aquire
|
||||
done = __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&rwlock->state, 0 /* cur state */, -1 /* new state */); // C++11 memory_order_aquire
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!timespec_from_absolute(rel_timeout, abs_timeout)) {
|
||||
return ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Failed to acquire, hang up.
|
||||
// To avoid losing wake ups the pending_writers update and the state read should be
|
||||
// sequentially consistent. (currently enforced by __atomic_inc which creates a full barrier)
|
||||
__atomic_inc(&rwlock->pending_writers); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed (if the futex_wait ensures the ordering)
|
||||
// sequentially consistent. (currently enforced by __sync_fetch_and_add which creates a full barrier)
|
||||
__sync_fetch_and_add(&rwlock->pending_writers, 1); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed (if the futex_wait ensures the ordering)
|
||||
int ret = __futex_wait_ex(&rwlock->state, rwlock_is_shared(rwlock), cur_state, rel_timeout);
|
||||
__atomic_dec(&rwlock->pending_writers); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed
|
||||
__sync_fetch_and_sub(&rwlock->pending_writers, 1); // C++11 memory_order_relaxed
|
||||
if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
|
||||
return ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -211,14 +210,11 @@ int pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock, const timespec* abs_tim
|
||||
|
||||
int pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock) {
|
||||
int32_t cur_state = rwlock->state;
|
||||
if (cur_state >= 0) {
|
||||
if(__atomic_cmpxchg(cur_state, cur_state + 1, &rwlock->state) != 0) { // C++11 memory_order_acquire
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
if ((cur_state >= 0) &&
|
||||
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&rwlock->state, cur_state, cur_state + 1)) { // C++11 memory_order_acquire
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int pthread_rwlock_wrlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock) {
|
||||
@ -232,16 +228,12 @@ int pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock, const timespec* abs_tim
|
||||
int pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock) {
|
||||
int tid = __get_thread()->tid;
|
||||
int32_t cur_state = rwlock->state;
|
||||
if (cur_state == 0) {
|
||||
if(__atomic_cmpxchg(0, -1, &rwlock->state) != 0) { // C++11 memory_order_acquire
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
if ((cur_state == 0) &&
|
||||
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&rwlock->state, 0 /* cur state */, -1 /* new state */)) { // C++11 memory_order_acquire
|
||||
rwlock->writer_thread_id = tid;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rwlock->writer_thread_id = tid;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -260,11 +252,11 @@ int pthread_rwlock_unlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock) {
|
||||
// We're no longer the owner.
|
||||
rwlock->writer_thread_id = 0;
|
||||
// Change state from -1 to 0.
|
||||
// We use __atomic_cmpxchg to achieve sequential consistency of the state store and
|
||||
// We use __sync_bool_compare_and_swap to achieve sequential consistency of the state store and
|
||||
// the following pendingX loads. A simple store with memory_order_release semantics
|
||||
// is not enough to guarantee that the pendingX loads are not reordered before the
|
||||
// store (which may lead to a lost wakeup).
|
||||
__atomic_cmpxchg(-1 /* cur_state*/, 0 /* new state */, &rwlock->state); // C++11 maybe memory_order_seq_cst?
|
||||
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap( &rwlock->state, -1 /* cur state*/, 0 /* new state */); // C++11 maybe memory_order_seq_cst?
|
||||
|
||||
// Wake any waiters.
|
||||
if (__predict_false(rwlock->pending_readers > 0 || rwlock->pending_writers > 0)) {
|
||||
@ -273,8 +265,8 @@ int pthread_rwlock_unlock(pthread_rwlock_t* rwlock) {
|
||||
done = true;
|
||||
} else { // cur_state > 0
|
||||
// Reduce state by 1.
|
||||
// See the above comment on why we need __atomic_cmpxchg.
|
||||
done = __atomic_cmpxchg(cur_state, cur_state - 1, &rwlock->state) == 0; // C++11 maybe memory_order_seq_cst?
|
||||
// See the comment above on why we need __sync_bool_compare_and_swap.
|
||||
done = __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&rwlock->state, cur_state, cur_state - 1); // C++11 maybe memory_order_seq_cst?
|
||||
if (done && (cur_state - 1) == 0) {
|
||||
// There are no more readers, wake any waiters.
|
||||
if (__predict_false(rwlock->pending_readers > 0 || rwlock->pending_writers > 0)) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user