am fdea643a: am f9fb52ab: Merge "bionic: benchmarks: Add BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait"

* commit 'fdea643af96379b5a19968d91ba6dc1758d8dcdf':
  bionic: benchmarks: Add BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait
This commit is contained in:
Mark Salyzyn 2015-02-12 21:03:12 +00:00 committed by Android Git Automerger
commit 233c0da3ef

View File

@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ static void BM_semaphore_sem_post(int iters) {
pthread_attr_setschedparam(&attr, &param);
pthread_attr_setschedpolicy(&attr, SCHED_OTHER);
pthread_attr_setdetachstate(&attr, PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED);
#ifdef PTHREAD_SET_INHERIT_SCHED
pthread_attr_setinheritsched(&attr, PTHREAD_EXPLICIT_SCHED);
#endif
pthread_t pthread;
pthread_create(&pthread, &attr, BM_semaphore_sem_post_start_thread, &semaphore);
pthread_attr_destroy(&attr);
@ -141,3 +144,98 @@ static void BM_semaphore_sem_post(int iters) {
} while (!BM_semaphore_sem_post_running);
}
BENCHMARK(BM_semaphore_sem_post);
/*
* This test reports the overhead of sem_post to sem_wake. A circle of
* num_semaphore - 1 threads are run on a set of semaphores to measure the
* activity. One can calculate the sem_wake overhead alone by:
*
* BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait - BM_semaphore_sem_post - BM_time_clock_gettime
*
* Differences will result if there are more threads than active processors,
* there will be delay induced when scheduling the processes. This cost is
* measured by trying different values of num_semaphore. The governor selected
* will have a major impact on the results for a large number of threads.
*
* To reduce the chances for threads racing ahead and not triggering the
* futex, for example the background threads finish their job before the
* sem_wait is hit in the main thread, the background threads will run at
* batch priority and the main thread at fifo priority. This should generally
* guarantee the main thread completes its task of priming itself with the
* sem_wait before the other threads can start. In practice without the
* sched mechanics here, this works on Android configured kernels, this is
* insurance for wacky(tm) sched configurations.
*/
static void *BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_start_thread(void *obj) {
sem_t *semaphore = reinterpret_cast<sem_t *>(obj);
while ((BM_semaphore_sem_post_running > 0) && !sem_wait(semaphore)) {
sem_post(semaphore + 1);
}
--BM_semaphore_sem_post_running;
return NULL;
}
static void BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_num(int iters, int num_semaphore) {
StopBenchmarkTiming();
sem_t semaphore[num_semaphore];
for (int i = 0; i < num_semaphore; ++i) {
sem_init(semaphore + i, 0, 0);
}
pthread_attr_t attr;
pthread_attr_init(&attr);
BM_semaphore_sem_post_running = 1;
struct sched_param param = { 0, };
pthread_attr_setschedparam(&attr, &param);
pthread_attr_setschedpolicy(&attr, SCHED_BATCH);
pthread_attr_setdetachstate(&attr, PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED);
#ifdef PTHREAD_SET_INHERIT_SCHED
pthread_attr_setinheritsched(&attr, PTHREAD_EXPLICIT_SCHED);
#endif
for (int i = 0; i < (num_semaphore - 1); ++i) {
pthread_t pthread;
pthread_create(&pthread, &attr, BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_start_thread, semaphore + i);
}
pthread_attr_destroy(&attr);
sched_yield();
param.sched_priority = 1;
sched_setscheduler((pid_t)0, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
StartBenchmarkTiming();
for (int i = 0; i < iters; i += num_semaphore) {
sem_post(semaphore);
sem_wait(semaphore + num_semaphore - 1);
}
StopBenchmarkTiming();
param.sched_priority = 0;
sched_setscheduler((pid_t)0, SCHED_OTHER, &param);
if (BM_semaphore_sem_post_running > 0) {
BM_semaphore_sem_post_running = 0;
}
for (int i = 0;
(i < (10 * num_semaphore)) && (BM_semaphore_sem_post_running > (1 - num_semaphore));
++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < (num_semaphore - 1); ++j) {
sem_post(semaphore + j);
}
sched_yield();
}
}
static void BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_low(int iters) {
BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_num(iters, 2);
}
BENCHMARK(BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_low);
static void BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_high(int iters) {
BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_num(iters, 100);
}
BENCHMARK(BM_semaphore_sem_post_sem_wait_high);